District of Columbia v. Tilghman
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
Appellees sued for damages resulting from a collision between appellee Tilghman’s car and a truck owned by appellant and operated by one of its employees. Trial was to the court and at the close of appellees’ case, the District moved for a finding in its favor, which motion was denied. The District elected to stand on its motion and offered no evidence. Judgment was entered for appellees and this appeal followed. The case coming to us in this posture, we, like the trial court, must view the evidence in the light most favorable to appellees, giving them the benefit of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. PostomCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Cox v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Carow v. BishopDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
- Grober v. Capital Transit Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1954
- Merriam v. SugrueDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Leiken v. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Chavis v. Commercial Storage, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- Nash Ex Rel. Nash v. Stanley Warner Management Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
- Dublin Sportswear v. CharlettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Lawrence v. WilloughbyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.