Legal Opinion

Banfield v. Brodell

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 2006No. 06 MA 8PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DeGenaro, Judge.

{¶ 1} This timely appeal comes for consideration upon the record in the trial court, the parties’ briefs, and their oral arguments before this court. Defendants-appellants, James Brodell and James Brodell, Inc., appeal the decision of the Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas that granted the motion of plaintiff-appellee, Sandra Banfield, for relief from judgment of an order dismissing her complaint. Brodell argues that Banfield failed to show excusable neglect, so she was not entitled to relief from judgment under Civ.R. 60(B).

{¶ 2} This court reviews a trial court’s decision…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Strack v. PeltonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Kay v. Marc Glassman, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Doe v. Trumbull County Children Services BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Campbell v. Aepli, Ct 06-0069 (7-16-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API