Legal Opinion
ROSCITI v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided October 7, 2011No. 10-2087PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Henry Roseiti, Donna Rosci-ti, and Henry Roseiti, Jr. (“the Roscitis”) sued Monaco Coach Corporation (“Monaco”) over alleged defects in a motor home Monaco manufactured. Monaco was self-insured for liability up to $500,000, and appellee Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (“ICSOP”) provided excess insurance for liability above $500,000. Monaco went bankrupt shortly after the Roscitis filed their lawsuit. Therefore, the Roscitis added ICSOP as a defendant, invoking a Rhode Island statute allowing tort victims to recover damages directly from…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Carmona v. ToledoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Anthony Artuso v. Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Gibson v. City of CranstonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Kuperman v. WrennCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Hubbard v. Tyco Integrated Cable Systems, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2013
- Gulf Underwriters Insurance v. BurrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- McGair v. American Bankers InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Peerless Indemnity Insurance C v. FrostCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Lu v. MeninoDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.