Blau v. Bernagozzi
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 16, March T., 1913, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Lackawanna Co., Jan. T., 1912, No. 309, on verdict for defendant in case of A. Blau v. W. P. Bernagozzi. Sheriff’s interpleader to determine the ownership of certain personal property. ' Before O’Neill, J. The facts are stated in the opinion , of the Superior Court. • Verdict and judgment for defendant for 1479, by direction of the court. Plaintiff appealed.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 16, March T., 1913, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Lackawanna Co., Jan. T., 1912, No. 309, on verdict for defendant in case of A. Blau v. W. P. Bernagozzi. Sheriff’s interpleader to determine the ownership of certain personal property. ' Before O’Neill, J. The facts are stated in the opinion , of the Superior Court. • Verdict and judgment for defendant for 1479, by direction of the court. Plaintiff appealed. Error assigned was in giving binding instructions for defendant.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Head, J.,
At the trial of the interpleader it appeared that the plaintiff was the landlord of the execution defendant. *113The latter had allowed the rent of the demised premises to become in arrears until something over $800 was due and owing to the plaintiff. On July 5, 1911, an agreement was reached between the parties by the terms of which the tenant executed and delivered to the plaintiff a bill of sale for the personal property on the demised premises. This property consisted generally of tables, chairs, wall mirrors, etc., the furnishings of the various rooms in the building which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dougherty's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844
- Woods v. IrwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- Clark v. DouglassSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
- Thompson's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
- Cessna v. NimickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.