Legal Opinion
Creditanstalt Investment Bank AG. v. Chadbourne & Parke LLP
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 4, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Barbara R. Kapnick, J.
*482Plaintiffs Creditanstalt Investment Bank AG., an Austrian investment bank, CIS Emerging Fund Limited, a Cypriot investment company, and Zao Financial Partners and Zao Creditanstalt-Grant, two Russian joint stock companies, commenced this action against the defendant Chadbourne & Parke LLP seeking to recover damages for legal malpractice arising out of the defendant law firm’s alleged negligence in improperly advising plaintiffs about the risks associated with the implementation of a particular investment structure called a “Simple Partnership…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Islamic Republic of Iran v. PahlaviNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Silver v. Great American InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Banco Ambrosiano v. Artoc Bank & Trust Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Bata v. BataNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Creditanstalt Investment Bank AG v. Chadbourne & Parke LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re OxyContinNew York Supreme Court · 2007
- Creditanstalt Inv. Bank Ag. v. Chadbourne & Parke LLPNew York Supreme Court, New York County · 2004