Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Rundlet

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire

Decided October 15, 1846No. Case No. 7,145PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODBURY, Circuit Justice.

It is well settled, that an objection founded on duplicity in pleading can be taken advantage of only by a special demurrer. Otis v. Blake, 6 Mass. 336. Because the defect is in form rather than substance, tending to prolixity, unnecessary expense in recording and copying, and confusion with courts and juries by. multifarious and mixed issues. 1 Chit. Pl. 513. The duplicity must also be specially pointed out. 1 Saund. 337b; 10 East, 73; Currie v. Henry, 2 Johns. 433. In this case, the designation of the duplicity is imperfect, but the demurrer may be regarded as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Harlan v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1843
  2. Hughes v. Smith & MillerNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  3. Postmaster-General of the United States v. CochranNew York Supreme Court · 1807
  4. Currie v. HenryNew York Supreme Court · 1807
  5. Bennett v. IrwinNew York Supreme Court · 1808

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. OlmsteadDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1925
  2. Hough v. HoughOregon Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API