Estes v. Chesney
Supreme Court of Arkansas
APPEAL from Yell Circuit Court, Danville District. Jordan'E. Cravens, Judge. Appellants sued out an attachment for the property of appellees, alleging a fraudulent disposition thereof. The attachment was dissolved. Judgment against appellants was rendered on the attachment bond for damages sustained by the wrongful issuance of the writ., The facts are stated in the opinion. 1. The court erred in refusing a change of venue. Mansf.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from Yell Circuit Court, Danville District. Jordan'E. Cravens, Judge. Appellants sued out an attachment for the property of appellees, alleging a fraudulent disposition thereof. The attachment was dissolved. Judgment against appellants was rendered on the attachment bond for damages sustained by the wrongful issuance of the writ., The facts are stated in the opinion. 1. The court erred in refusing a change of venue. Mansf. Dig., sec. 6479; ib., sec. 5060. 2. The court erred in discharging the attachment. Ib., sec. 69; Bump. Fr. Conv., pp. 34, 50. 3. The court erred in admitting,…
1Opinion of the Court
Hemingway, J. J
1. Bui of exceptions should veime. 1. The appellants insist that the judgL 1 J ® should be reversed because the court improperly denied their motion for a change of venue. This is a question which we cannot consider, for the reason that the petition for a change of venue and supporting affidavits are not brought upon the record by bill of exceptions. Stearns v. Ry. Co., 94 Mo., 317; Wolff v. Ward, 16 S. W., 161.
2 Evidence of damages m tIchmCTftul 2. It was competent for the defendant to prove the value goods before their seizure under the attachment, and also the extent of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Stearns v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1887
3Cited by2 opinions
- Adkisson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- London v. KennedySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929