Legal Opinion
State v. King
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided July 29, 1997No. 96-2735PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLaROCQUE, J.
The State appeals an order dismissing its prosecution of Dennis J. King, Ronald E. King, Simon W. DeCoteau, Ronald W. Hill and Earl J. Jordan (collectively, the respondents) for fishing within 500 feet of a dam in contravention of Wis. Adm. Code §§ NR 20.09(2)(c) and 20.07(2)(a). The State asserts that the trial court erred when it found that the respondents, members of the Oneida tribe, were fishing within reservation borders. The State also requests this court to vacate portions of the trial court's judgment, which it claims would be potentially prejudicial in future litigation. We modify…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jones v. MeehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Solem v. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Factor v. LaubenheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Choctaw Nation v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. NavarroCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- Griffin v. Mark Travel Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006