Legal Opinion

Sandonas v. Weirton Steel Corp.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 9, 1986No. Civ. A. No. 85-2830Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COHILL, Chief Judge.

This is a diversity suit arising out of an accident suffered by plaintiff, George San-donas. The matter is presently before us on motions by defendants, Weirton Steel Corporation (“Weirton”), National Steel Corporation (“National”), and Phillip D. Henry, M.D., to transfer the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).

Plaintiffs, George and Angela Sandonas, are residents of Steubenville, Ohio. Weir-ton is a Delaware corporation with offices in Weirton, West Virginia. National is a Delaware…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Shutte v. Armco Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  5. Rosemarie T. Schwilm, Administratrix of the Estate of Carrol A. Schwilm, Deceased v. Thomas J. Holbrook, M.D. And Cabell Huntington HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API