Legal Opinion · Dissent

Miles v. Lear Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 2008No. ED 89961Published

1Dissent

KURT S. ODENWALD, Judge.

I respectfully dissent. I agree with the majority that the record before us contains competent and substantial evidence to support the Commission’s finding that Miles’ injuries were due to an accident arising out of and in the course of Miles’ employment, and that Miles’ injuries were caused by his participation in a voluntary recreational activity. However, the decision of the Commission should be reversed because Miles’ injuries are not compensable under the forfeiture provisions of Section 287.120.7. The Commission misapplied the law in holding that the forfeiture…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bachtel v. Miller County Nursing Home DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. State Ex Rel. Killingsworth v. GeorgeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Wilson v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. State Ex Rel. Womack v. RolfSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  5. Kincade v. Treasurer of the State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API