Legal Opinion

Silver v. . Woodbury

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 1921PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division, of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 3, 1918, unanimously affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.

Read the full summary

Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division, of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 3, 1918, unanimously affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term. The action was to recover damages for a portion of a platform removed and to enjoin the further removal of structures existing between high and low-water mark between Twenty-second and Twenty-third streets, Coney Island, New' York city. The trial court granted the injunction and assessed damages against Egburt E. Woodbury, as…

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment reversed as to defendant Woodbury, as attorney-general, and as to defendant Lerner, as deputy attorney-general, and otherwise affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Anddrews, JJ.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schwarzstein v. B. B. Bathing Park, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. In re the Town of HempsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API