Legal Opinion

Wilmer v. Haines

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 13, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParke, J.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is based on the ground that the transcript of the record was not transmitted to the Court of Appeals within three months from the time of the appeal prayed. The order for the appeal was filed on November 18th, 1924, and the record was- not received by the Court of Appeals until February 19th, 1925, which was one day too late,- unless the failure to comply with the statute was due to a delay which was occasioned by the neglect, omission, or inability of the clerk or the appellee. Bagby’s Code 1924, art. 5, secs. 37, 44; Horseman v. Furbush, 124 Md. 581; Md., D.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maryland, Delaware & Virginia Railway Co. v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  2. Horseman v. FurbushCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  3. Marx v. ReineckeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jacober v. High Hill Realty, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Uhler v. Real Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Brinsfield v. MatherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API