Legal Opinion

Grimm v. Kubach

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 8, 1913No. 17,670PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Dickinson district court.

1Per curiam

This action was brought by the appellee to recover from the appellants a sum alleged to have been paid by him to the holders of the appellee’s promissory motes, which notes are alleged to have been given to 'appellants and the consideration for which was in whole or in part a patent right or an interest in a patent right; that the notes did not contain the words “Given for a patent right” as required, by section 5516 of-the General Statutes of 1909,. and that the holders thereof, to whom the payments were made, were innocent holders. There was evidence to sustain the finding of the court in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nyhart v. KubachSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Hankey v. DowneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Tredick v. WaltersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. Bolte v. SparksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  5. State v. MoreySupreme Court of Kansas · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fidelity State Bank v. EvansSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API