Legal Opinion
State v. Estabrook
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided January 15, 1883PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Error from Franklin District Court. Action upon a bond executed under § 2 of the prohibition act of 1881. At the May Term, 1882, of the district court, judgment for the defendants Estabrook and two others, and against The State, which brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
"Valentine, J.:
This' was an action brought in the name of the state of. Kansas, by the county attorney of Franklin county, against C. H. Estabrook, A. R. Hamilton and Mary S. Estabrook, upon a penal bond executed by the defendants under §2 of the prohibition act of 1881. The bond reads as follows:
“Know all men by these presents, that we, C. H. Estabrook as principal, A. R. Hamilton and Mary S. Estabrook as sureties, are held and firmly bound unto the state of Kansas in the sum of one thousand dollars, to the'payment of which sum, well and truly to be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gay v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- State v. WeatherwaxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- State v. PierceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. WipkeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- O'Kane v. LedererDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1923
- State v. Vending Machine Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- State v. VienupSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
- Accident and Casualty Ins. Co. v. CookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.