Legal Opinion

Harter v. Moore

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1840PublishedCited by 8 opinions

ERROR to the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDewey, J.

Moore sued Harter and Hanna on three sealed notes for 100 dollars each with ten per cent, interest, describing them in his declaration as being executed by Harter in the name and style of “Is. V.- Harter '& Co.,” and by Hanna- in his own proper name; Harter did not, appear to the action, and an interlocutory judgment was entered against him. Hanna craved oyer of the notes, which was granted; the notes purported to be executed by Is. V. Harter & Co., and by Hanna with the word “ surety ” affixed to his name. Hanna pleaded, 1st, That the notes had been procured from him by fraud, &c.; on this…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coman v. State ex rel. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1837
  2. Hagar v. MountsIndiana Supreme Court · 1832
  3. Naylor v. MoodyIndiana Supreme Court · 1832
  4. Braman v. HowkIndiana Supreme Court · 1825

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Post v. LoseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Abel v. AlexanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Helms v. Wayne Agricultural Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Hogshead v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Pierce v. GoldsberryIndiana Supreme Court · 1869

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API