Legal Opinion

Kurylo v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided April 19, 2000No. 99-1342PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P.J.

¶ 1. Here, we conclude that Wis. STAT. § 32.06(2a) (1997-98), 1 which prescribes the procedures that must be followed before a condemnor may take property via eminent domain, does not require that the condemnor file the required certificate of compensation at the same time it records the conveyance. We thus affirm the trial court's determination that the condemnor did not violate the statute when it filed the certificates months after recording the corresponding conveyances. Additionally, we reject the contention that the condemnor failed to negotiate in good faith. We affirm.

¶ 2. The facts…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Voss v. City of MiddletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Beard v. Lee Enterprises, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Hauboldt v. Union Carbide Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Arrowhead Farms, Inc. v. Dodge CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Scott N. Waller v. American Transmission Company, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Danielson v. City of Sun PrairieCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
  3. Danielson v. City of Sun PrairieCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
  4. Scott N. Waller v. American Transmission Company, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API