Legal Opinion

Harrison v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1938No. 30184PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoss, C. J.

Defendant was convicted on an information charging that he did forcibly break and enter a motor vehicle with the intent to steal therefrom property of value contained within the automobile. He brings proceedings in error to reverse the judgment based on the verdict.

By section 28-596, Comp. St. Supp. 1935, the legislature provided: “Every person who shall break and enter, or enter without breaking, at any time, any motor vehicle, with intent to commit the crime of larceny, shall be deemed guilty of a felony, and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by imprisonment in the penitentiary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. VierckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Foreman v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Alt v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Maynard v. United States. Mallette v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  2. Jurgensen v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Yost v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State v. SukovatyNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Hunt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API