Legal Opinion

Steven M. Garber & Associates v. Zuber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum:

By motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213, plaintiff commenced this action to enforce a judgment entered in California upon the default of Kim John Zuber (defendant). Contrary to defendant’s contention, Supreme Court properly granted the motion. “Absent a jurisdictional challenge, a final judgment entered upon the defendant’s default in appearing in an action is . . . entitled to be given full faith and credit in the courts of this State” (GNOC Corp. v Cappelletti, 208 AD2d 498 [1994]; see Fiore v Oakwood Plaza Shopping Ctr., 78 NY2d 572, 577 [1991],…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. United States v. Central Eureka Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Town of Oyster Bay v. Syosset's Concern About its Neighborhood (SCAN)New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Fiore v. Oakwood Plaza Shopping Center, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Khallad v. BlancAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Khallad v. BlancAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API