Manhattan Life Insurance v. Doll

— Action by the appellee against the appellant on a policy of insurance executed by the defendant, whereby the defendant assured the life of one Hezekiah B. Stran, for the benefit of the plaintiff Doll, who was the creditor of Stran.

Issue; trial; verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.

In his brief, the counsel for the appellant says: “ The errors relied upon for the reversal of the judgment are:

“ First. The decision of the court overruling the demurrer to the second paragraph of the reply.

“ Second. The decision of the court overruling the appellant’s motion to strike out the second paragraph…