Legal Opinion

Muzzy v. Rockingham County Trust Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 28, 1973No. 6546PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C.J.

The principal issue in this case is whether the trial court properly granted the defendant’s motion for nonsuit in an action to recover damages for the alleged conversion by the defendant bank by its retention of certain stock certificates belonging to the plaintiff. The standard of review is whether the evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom, construed most favorably to the plaintiff, would permit a jury to find in her favor. Scott v. J.J. Brady & Sons, Inc., 113 N.H. 65, 67, 302 A.2d 108, 109 (1973); Dubreuil v. Dubreuil, 107 N.H. 519, 520, 229 A.2d 338, 339 (1967).

The basic facts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pacific & Atlantic Shippers v. SchierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
  2. Dubreuil v. DubreuilSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
  3. Hett v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1897
  4. Gove v. WatsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1881
  5. Scott v. J. J. Brady & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Kierstead v. Betley Chevrolet-Buick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  2. Estate v. International Harvester CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  3. Isaac v. CrichlowSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
  4. Kenerson v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  5. Curtis Manufacturing Co. v. Plasti-Clip Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1994

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API