Mutual Life Insurance v. Ginsburg
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
These two pieces of litigation are between the same parties and revolve around the same subject matter. While the questions are different the two cases are, for convenience, treated in one opinion.
I
The first case is an appeal from an order made by a judge in the Western District of Pennsylvania ordering a case to be transferred from that district to the District of Arizona.1 The authority for the transfer was section 1404(a) of 28 U.S.C. which reads as follows:
“(a) For the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- All States Freight, Inc. v. ModarelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Paramount Pictures, Inc. v. Rodney, U.S. District Judge (Two Cases). Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. Rodney, U.S. District Judge (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Hunter v. Federal Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. GinsburgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956