Ingle v. Angell
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Wilkin county to recover $289.17. The case was tried before Elaherty, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $283.25. Erom an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, he appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
.O’Brien, J.
The plaintiff’s demand consists of three causes of action — $236.17, a balance claimed to be due upon an account stated between J. G. Ingle and defendant, and assigned to plaintiff; $3, upon another account between those persons, also assigned to plaintiff; and a balance of $50, for personal services rendered to defendant by plaintiff. There was a conflict of evidence as to each of these claims, making a plain question of fact as to each, and they were all fully and fairly submitted to the jury, which found for the plaintiff in the sum of $283.25. This appeal is from an order…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Plummer v. MoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Tuggle v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by8 opinions
- Meagher v. KavliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Theodore Wetmore & Co. v. ThurmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Behrens v. KruseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Lufkin v. HarveySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Salt Lake Engineering Works v. Utah Concrete Pipe Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.