Legal Opinion
Meshel v. Board of Regents of University
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 25, 1985PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Casey, J.
After hearings conducted pursuant to Education Law § 6510, petitioner was found guilty of practicing the profession of medicine while his ability to practice was impaired by drugs and mental disability. As a result, petitioner’s license to practice medicine was revoked and this proceeding to review that determination ensued.
Petitioner does not challenge the factual findings which serve as the basis for respondents’ conclusion that he was guilty of practicing the profession of medicine while his ability to practice was impaired by drugs and mental disability. Rather, the main thrust…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kirsch v. Board of Regents of the UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Salva v. Board of RegentsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by6 opinions
- Okereke v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- O'Brien v. Commissioner of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- McCarthy v. Board of RegentsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Clark v. AmbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- A. Hamid Alizadeh v. AmbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.