Muller v. Philadelphia & Easton Electric Ry. Co.

Swartz, P. J.,

38th judicial district, specially presiding, The plaintiff alleges that the defendant railway company is locating and constructing its tracks along the east side of the highway upon which his properties abut, and that such location and construction are without notice to him and without any authority of law. He asks for a restraining order.

The defendants answer that the proposed construction was ordered by the Public Service Commission in abolishing grade crossings, and in the lawful exercise of its powers; that the plaintiff is not entitled to the injunction prayed for.

Findings…