Legal Opinion

Boise Bowling Center v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1969No. 10271PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALDSON, Justice.

The sixteen plaintiffs-respondents (fifteen proprietors of bowling alleys and the American Machine & Foundry Co., hereafter referred to as A.M.F., who supplies and leases to these proprietors certain devices Used in their respective enterprises), brought suit against the State of Idaho to recover sales taxes paid by the fifteen proprietors (on the equipment leased by them from A.M.F.) which were collected by A.M.F. and then paid to the State.

A.M.F. leases automatic pinsetting devices to each plaintiff-respondent. The rental payment is. based on the use (number of lines…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Leonardson v. MoonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Ex parte MehlmanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Hotels Statler Co., Inc. v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  4. Lakewood Lanes, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. City of Sun Valley v. Sun Valley Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Hooks v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  3. American Totalisator Co. v. DubnoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. City of Prescott v. Town of Chino ValleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  5. Miami Copper Co. Division, Tennessee Corp. v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API