Bagley v. United States
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
ROBERT J. TIMLIN, District Judge.
Through this action, Plaintiff Richard D. Bagley (“Bagley”) seeks a refund of feder*985al income taxes paid by him in the amount of $3,874,407 with respect to the 2003 tax year. From 1994 through 2003, Bagley, on behalf of the United States of America (“government”), prosecuted TRW Inc. (“TRW”) for false claims under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq. For his actions as a relator under the FCA, the government paid Bagley a FCA award of $27,244,0000 and statutory attorneys’ fees of $9,407,295. Of the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Indopco, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. GilmoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Commissioner v. GroetzingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chai v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- United States ex rel. Holloway v. Heartland Hospice, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019
- O'Donnell v. Allegheny Co. Tax Apl of: Fox ChapelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2021