Legal Opinion

Reese v. Provident Funding Associates, LLP

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 12, 2012No. A12A0619PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

Izell and Raven Reese filed the underlying lawsuit against Provident Funding Associates, LLP (“Provident”), seeking damages for wrongful foreclosure.1 Both parties sought summary judgment, which the trial court granted in favor of Provident and denied in favor of the Reeses. On appeal, the Reeses contend that the trial court erred in granting Provident’s motion for summary judgment on the wrongful foreclosure claim, and in denying the Reeses’ cross-motion for summary judgment on that issue, because (1) Provident’s June 2009 foreclosure notice did not comply with the requirements…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mason v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  2. Roylston v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. Alltel Georgia Communications v. Georgia Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  4. ChoicePoint Services, Inc. v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  5. McDaniel v. Hensons', Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. You v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  2. Moore v. McCalla Raymer, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013
  3. Stowers v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. Reese v. Provident Funding Associates, LLPCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  5. Izell Reese v. Provident Funding Associates, LLPCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API