Legal Opinion · Dissent

Foote v. Peaslee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 19, 1923Published

1Dissent

Hasbrouck, J. (dissenting):

This case comes here under a submission properly made in accordance with section 546 of the Civil Practice Act.

It shows among others the following facts, a knowledge of which is regarded as essential to any determination of the controversy.

Jonathan G. Witherbee was possessed in his day and generation of a very considerable estáte. He was twice married. First to *334Charlotte Spencer who separated from him on or before the 23d day of July, 1867, and for whose support and maintenance he made provision during such separation. Later and on the 9th day of January, 1869,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Manice v. . ManiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. In Re the Accounting of BuechnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Gilman v. . ReddingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  4. Fowler v. . IngersollNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Norris v. BeyeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1855

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API