Legal Opinion

Morra v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 2, 1985No. 83-2511PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FERGUSON, Judge.

Defendant was convicted of trafficking in cocaine. On appeal, he contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal on the ground that the State failed to introduce into evidence the subject cocaine, although it did offer uncontroverted expert testimony that the substance seized was in fact cocaine. We affirm.

Defendant relies on G.E.G. v. State, 417 So.2d 975 (Fla.1982), wherein the Florida Supreme Court held that:

when a defendant is charged with possession of a controlled substance, that substance, if available, must be introduced into…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. G. E. G. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  2. G. E. G. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. State v. ArmstrongDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  4. Alexander v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  5. Maddox v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Coleman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API