Legal Opinion

Morgenthau v. Barrett

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 6, 1939No. 7340PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGroner, C. J.

In May, 1938, petitioner-appellee filed in the District Court his petition for a writ of mandamus1 directed to the Secretary of the Treasury and the members of the Department’s Committee on Enrollment and Disbarment, commanding them to admit him as an attorney. In the alternative, he prayed that the court declare his rights, as a retired officer of the army, in relation to the controversy. Upon entry of a rule to show cause, the Secretary and the Committee filed their return and answer. The trial court sustained petitioner’s demurrer to' the answer and issued the writ.

The facts are not in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kahn v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. United States v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Levine v. FarleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  4. Collins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1879
  5. Badeau v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. MacMillan v. Montecito Country Club, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1946
  2. Van Meter v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  3. Mitchell v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
  4. Delaware & Hudson R. Corporation v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  5. Holland v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API