Legal Opinion

Garcia v. State

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 16, 1986No. 1 CA-CIV 8339PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EUBANK, Judge.

The plaintiff-appellant appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendant-appel*147lee, striking her second motion to set her case for trial and dismissing the case without prejudice for lack of prosecution because of her failure to comply with Rule V, Arizona Uniform Rules of Practice of the Superior Court (Rule V). Rule Y applies to civil cases in Maricopa County. Rule 3.4, Superior Court Local Rules, Maricopa County. We affirm the judgment.

On October 15, 1984, appellant’s original counsel simultaneously filed a list of witnesses and exhibits and a motion to set and certificate of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Bickerstaff v. Denny's Restaurant, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Staffco, Inc. v. Maricopa Trading Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. McLoughlinArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Evans v. ArthurArizona Supreme Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hyman v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  2. Eloy Industrial Engines v. R.B. EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API