Legal Opinion

Opinion No. Oag 55-76, (1976)

Wisconsin Attorney General Reports

Decided August 16, 1976PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES R. KLAUSER, Chairman, State Elections Board

You have asked a number of questions related to the impact of the United States Supreme Court decision in the case of Buckleyv. Valeo (1976), 96 S.Ct. 612, on the state's campaign finance law as enforced by the State Elections Board. The Supreme Court in the Buckley case held that certain provisions of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (hereafter FECA), as amended in 1974, violated First Amendment guarantees of freedom of expression and association. It is apparent from the Buckley case and a comparison of the Federal Election Campaign…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Town of Madison v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Elections Board v. Wisconsin Manufacturers & CommerceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Opinion No. Oag 57-78, (1978), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1978
  3. Elections Board v. Wisconsin Manufacturers & CommerceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Opinion No. Oag 22-79, (1979), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1979
  5. Opinion No. Oag 60-79, (1979), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API