Legal Opinion
Silver v. Gattel
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided September 28, 1918PublishedCited by 3 opinions
On bill, &C.
1Opinion of the Court
Lake, V. C.
This is a suit to compel specific performance of a contract for the purchase of land.
*403The question involved is the validity of complainant’s title. On December 30th, 1913, the lands were sold by the city of Newark under the provision of “An act for the assessment and collection of taxes,” approved April 8th, 1903. 4 Comp. Stat. p. 5132 § 51, &c. The purchaser was Julius Cinnamon, who bought the lands in fee-simple. On February 11th, 1914, Cinnamon assigned his interest in the certificate of sale to complainant, Michael Silver. On March 29th, 1917, complainant, being the holder of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Arndt v. GriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- American Land Co. v. ZeissSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Clark v. ReyburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Mitsch v. OwensNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1913
3Cited by3 opinions
- Springgarden B. L. Assn. v. FusaroNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938
- Wilkes v. BrennanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
- Realty Co. v. BurghardtNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1919