Radebaugh v. Tacoma & Puyallup Railroad
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hoyt, J.
— Upon the application of a judgment creditor, a receiver was appointed for the Tacoma & Puyallup Railroad Company, who duly qualified and entered upon the discharge of his duties as such receiver. The appellant, the Mason Mortgage Loan Company, had a mortgage upon the railroad of said company, which, by express terms, included the rolling stock and other appurtenances belonging thereto. This was executed and recorded as a real estate mortgage, but was not executed with the formalities required by our statute to make it good as a chattel…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hammock v. Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Hoyle v. Plattsburgh & Montreal RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Vilas v. . PageNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Dow v. Memphis & L. R. R. Co.United States Circuit Court · 1884
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bennett v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Willamette Casket Co. v. Cross Undertaking Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895
- Cole v. Washington Motion Picture Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
- Manhattan Trust Co. v. Seattle Coal & Iron Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
- Bonneviere v. ColeWashington Supreme Court · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.