Legal Opinion

Radebaugh v. Tacoma & Puyallup Railroad

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1894No. 1088PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, J.

— Upon the application of a judgment creditor, a receiver was appointed for the Tacoma & Puyallup Railroad Company, who duly qualified and entered upon the discharge of his duties as such receiver. The appellant, the Mason Mortgage Loan Company, had a mortgage upon the railroad of said company, which, by express terms, included the rolling stock and other appurtenances belonging thereto. This was executed and recorded as a real estate mortgage, but was not executed with the formalities required by our statute to make it good as a chattel…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hammock v. Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Hoyle v. Plattsburgh & Montreal RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Vilas v. . PageNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. Dow v. Memphis & L. R. R. Co.United States Circuit Court · 1884

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bennett v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Willamette Casket Co. v. Cross Undertaking Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Cole v. Washington Motion Picture Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Manhattan Trust Co. v. Seattle Coal & Iron Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Bonneviere v. ColeWashington Supreme Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API