Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Bernstein

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 2, 2010No. 08-PR-1294, 08-PR-1400, 09-PR-530PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WASHINGTON, Chief Judge:

This case comes to us after almost ten years of legal wrangling primarily surrounding the question of whether David M. Albert and his counsel were properly denied compensation for litigation expenses arising from Mr. Albert’s efforts to administer the estate of Ruth F. Bernstein. For the reasons articulated below, we find that Mr. Albert is entitled to remuneration for the estate litigation expenses because he pursued the litigation in good faith and with just cause as required under D.C.Code § 20-752 (2001). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order requiring…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Duggan v. KetoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Hopkins v. AkinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Williams v. RayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. In Re Estate of KingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Rearden v. Riggs National Bank of WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lewis v. ParkerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API