Legal Opinion

Dutchville v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 24, 1968No. 67-298PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

' Appellant seeks reversal of the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief ^nder Criminal Procedure Rule 1 (now Rule 1.850, 33 F.S.A.). His motion alleged that the State knowingly used perjured testimony at his trial. Such allegation is not conclusively refuted by the record. Consequently, it was sufficient to have entitled appellant to an evidentiary hearing thereon. Rayburn v. State, Fla.App.1967, 203 So.2d 212, 213.

Accordingly, we reverse the appealed order and remand the cause with instructions to conduct an evidentiary hearing on the aforesaid allegation and to make…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rayburn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Presley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API