Legal Opinion

Mapoles v. Mapoles ex rel. Mapoles

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 28, 1976No. BB-329PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLS, Judge.

By interlocutory appeal, the defendants seek review of the trial court’s order granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment as to liability in a negligence action seeking damages for injuries caused by a dog.

Although the amended complaint charges Cam Mapoles with negligence only, both parties to this appeal urge us to determine whether, under the facts of this case, Section 767.01, Florida Statutes, makes Cam absolutely liable for the actions of her dog. We cannot do this, because this issue was not raised by the pleadings. Therefore, this issue was not legally presentable to…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mayo v. AllenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  2. Mapoles v. MapolesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API