Legal Opinion
Concept 29 Uniform Service v. Roe
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 12, 1989No. 88-CA-819PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WICKER, Judge.
This appeal arises from a judgment of default taken in Second Parish Court for the Parish of Jefferson on behalf of Concept 29 Uniform Service, Division of G & K Services, Inc. (Concept) against Patrick L. Roe and William Richmond both d/b/a Pat’s Tire & Auto Service, Inc. jointly and in solido. Only William Richmond (Richmond) appeals the judgment rendered for the sum of $2,176.74 plus interest, costs and attorney’s fees of 33⅛ per cent. We set aside the judgment of default in part, affirm in part, and remand.
On July 6, 1988 Concept filed a petition for damages as the result of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bonfouca Inv. Corp. v. EubanksLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
- Eddie's Hardware, Inc. v. RagoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- American Dist. Tel. Co. v. RaultLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
- United Distributors, Inc. v. RedfernLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- Buddy Patterson Gateway Gulf Service v. HowellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sessions & Fishman v. Liquid Air Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Mossy Motors, Inc. v. Cameras AmericaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- Morice v. Alan Yedor Roofing & ConstructionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017