Verderane v. Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WALTER E. HOFFMAN, District Judge:
One truism of the law is that substantive and procedural rights may be lost if not asserted in a timely fashion. That truism is no less valid in administrative tribunals than elsewhere. This petition for review raises the issue whether a party can rely on section 8(f) of the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S. C.A. § 908(f) (West Supp.1985) (“the Act”), when the relief afforded by that section was not raised at the first available opportunity. We conclude that a party cannot rely on section 8(f) in these circumstances, and therefore affirm…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc. v. Estate of VerderaneCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lucero v. Climax Molybdenum Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Universal Maritime Corporation v. Frank Moore Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Program United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Whitney v. AGSCO DAKOTASouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor v. Drummond Coal Company and Miles CorneliusCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Westmoreland Coal Co. v. Sharpe Ex Rel. SharpeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.