Legal Opinion

Verderane v. Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 30, 1985No. 84-3777PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTER E. HOFFMAN, District Judge:

One truism of the law is that substantive and procedural rights may be lost if not asserted in a timely fashion. That truism is no less valid in administrative tribunals than elsewhere. This petition for review raises the issue whether a party can rely on section 8(f) of the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S. C.A. § 908(f) (West Supp.1985) (“the Act”), when the relief afforded by that section was not raised at the first available opportunity. We conclude that a party cannot rely on section 8(f) in these circumstances, and therefore affirm…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc. v. Estate of VerderaneCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lucero v. Climax Molybdenum Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Universal Maritime Corporation v. Frank Moore Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Program United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  3. Whitney v. AGSCO DAKOTASouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor v. Drummond Coal Company and Miles CorneliusCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  5. Westmoreland Coal Co. v. Sharpe Ex Rel. SharpeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API