Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bresnahan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 13, 2012PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBotsford, J.

More than a year after his conviction for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, the

*762defendant, John W. Bresnahan, moved for postverdict inquiry of the jurors. The trial judge had recused himself, and a different judge granted the defendant’s motion for postverdict inquiry. After holding evidentiary hearings, the judge allowed the defendant’s motion for a new trial on the basis that the jury had been exposed to an extraneous influence during deliberations and the Commonwealth had failed to prove that the incident did not prejudice the defendant. The Appeals Court…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Parker v. GladdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. J. A. Sullivan Corp. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. RodriquezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  5. Commonwealth v. MoonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  2. JOHN J. SULLIVAN v. SUPERINTENDENT, MASSACHUSETTS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, SHIRLEY, & others.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022
  3. Commonwealth v. MurphyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. RocheleauMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
  5. Commonwealth v. FirminMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API