Legal Opinion

Houston & Texas Central Railway Co. v. Kelley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 13, 1896No. 1489PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Plaintiff had judgment for Si0,000.' ' The special charge No. 1, requested by defendant and refused, was of the nature in the first paragraph of the head-notes. All other instructions given or refused and evidence material to an understanding of the points ruled are given in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COLLARD, Associate Justice.

— Suit for damages by appellee against appellant for personal injuries. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff below, from which defendant has appealed.

Bindings of fact.- — Kelley was employed in the yards of the railroad company at Hearne, Texas, as a switchman. He was well informed as to his duties, and a good switchman. While in the discharge of his duties as switchman, he was injured in coupling cars to such an extent that his leg had to be amputated about midway up the thigh. He was twenty-three years old- at the time of the injury, was a strong, vigorous and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ShiederTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. McClainTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. G., C. & S. F. R'y Co. v. DorseyTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Murray v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Ry. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. HuffmanTexas Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wells, Fargo & Co. v. BenjaminTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ManghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  3. Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Dallas Ry. Co. v. EatonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Pearson v. Texas & N, O. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API