Legal Opinion

Waring v. Slingluff

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 9, 1885Published

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

The appellee replevied sundry marble monuments and tombstones, an iron safe, a horse and set of harness, appraised at $2390. The defendants, described as heirs of Louisa Torrance, avowed the taking of the property under a distress for rent. In the avowry, it is averred in substance, that one Jacob Weinman was tenant to the defendants of certain premises at a certain rent, which was in arrear to the amount of $139.50, and that the goods and chattels in question were on said premises, and were justly taken as a distress for the rent so in arrear. To this the plaintiff pleaded, 1st. that Weinman…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lorentz v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  2. Hoffar v. DementCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1847
  3. Joynes v. WartmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API