Brooks-Scanlon v. Lee
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
44 So.2d 650 (1950)
BROOKS-SCANLON, Inc. et al.
v.
LEE et al.
Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division B.
February 21, 1950.
Keen, O'Kelley & Spitz and A. Frank O'Kelley, Tallahassee, for appellants.
T.T. Turnbull and William A. O'Bryan, Tallahassee, for appellees.
ADAMS, Chief Justice.
The only question here is whether appellee's deceased husband sustained an injury by "accident" within the meaning of our Workmen's Compensation Act.
All inferior tribunals found in the affirmative although the circuit court plainly indicated that the injury preceded any possible accident, if there was any accident.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Protectu Awning Shutter Co. v. ClineSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
- Davis v. Artley Construction Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1944
- Cleary Bros. Construction Co. v. NoblesSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
- City of Tallahassee v. RobertsSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
- Cook v. Federal Const. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1949
3Cited by11 opinions
- Victor Wine & Liquor, Inc. v. BeasleySupreme Court of Florida · 1962
- Lewter v. Abercrombie Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Gray v. Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Swan v. WilliamsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
- McNeill v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.