Legal Opinion
Loeb v. Tanenbaum
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 26, 1986PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiffs commenced this action pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to declare terminated defendant’s rights in certain real property located in Delaware County. Defendant, an attorney represented by his own law firm, did not answer or otherwise appear, but instead moved for a change of venue to New York County. Plaintiffs cross-moved for a default judgment. Both motions were returnable on August 16, 1985, with defendant permitted to submit papers until August 30, 1985. Defendant submitted nothing more in opposition to the cross motion than an attorney’s affidavit stating that defendant’s failure…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Whitbeck v. Erin's Isle, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Dominski v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Fulton County National Bank & Trust Co. v. Fulton Automotive Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Nulman v. HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by11 opinions
- Flagstar Bank, FSB v. TitusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Biscone v. JetBlue Airways Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Cohen v. RomanoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Sheedy v. PatakiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Starr Block Co. v. TedescoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.