Legal Opinion

Griffin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 9, 1994No. 94-2252PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Neither the plea colloquy nor any other portion of the record refutes the appellant’s claim that his nolo plea to two counts of battery on a law enforcement officer was induced by his counsel’s erroneous advice that he “would be eligible for controlled release credits” on the agreed sentence. Griffin was therefore entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his 3.850 motion to set the plea aside. See Ortiz v. State, 622 So.2d 131 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Eady v. State, 604 So.2d 559 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Carter v. State, 599 So.2d 773 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); McCray v. State, 578 So.2d 29 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991);…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tarpley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Eady v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. McCray v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  5. Ortiz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Groves v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Rodriguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API