Amok Gold Mining Co. v. Canton Insurance Office
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
BEASLY, J., pro tem.
This is an action upon a policy of marine insurance, in which plaintiff recovered a verdict of $1,923, interest and costs; and defendant appeals from the judgment entered thereon.
By the policy the defendant insured mining supplies consisting of fifteen hundred feet of fuse, five drums of gasoline, one ton of sacked coal, seven tons of dynamite and 1M blast caps, “in the power schooner ‘Harold Blekum’ at and from Seattle, Washington, to Uyak, Alaska.” Subject to the effect of certain conversations between the master of the schooner and the owner, it is conceded that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The Sarah AnnU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1835
- Carpenter v. FisherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- Hall v. Ocean Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1889
- Robinson v. Commonwealth Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1838
- Snyder v. BougherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pendell v. Westland Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Washington Iron Works v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1924