Legal Opinion

Smotkin v. Manhattan-Ward, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 10, 1987No. Nos. 247 and 251PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, Judge:

This case involves an attempt by Harold R. Smotkin, individually, doing business as the Hub Store and the Hub Store, Inc., to enjoin Manhattan-Ward, Inc. from using the name “Hub” for their clothing stores in the York County area.

*599The procedural aspects of this case form the basis for our determination that a remand is necessary to allow the lower court to rule on the exceptions filed by both parties. We, therefore, will review the various stages of this litigation as it has transpired.

A complaint was filed in June of 1982 together with a motion for a preliminary injunction.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Consolidation Coal Co. v. District 5, United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Walley v. IracaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Naus & Newlyn, Inc. v. MasonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Humphreys v. CainCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. North Penn Gas Co. v. MahoskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wurtzel v. Park Towne Place Apartments Ltd. Partnership, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2001
  2. Elfman v. Berman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2001
  3. Jewelcor Management Inc. v. Thistle Group Holdings Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2002
  4. Vonada v. LongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API