Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nolechek v. Gesuale

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 27, 1978Published

1DissentCooke, J.

This court today concludes that one who is not a joint or concurrent tort-feasor may nonetheless be held liable for contribution under Dole v Dow Chem. Co. (30 NY2d 143). Because such a holding marks a sudden, unexplained departure from prior well-reasoned decisions, I must dissent.

At the outset, I note my agreement with the majority insofar as it refuses to create a cause of action in favor of the decedent against his parent. Surely, in the usual case, a father’s decision to give a particular article to his child, involving an assessment of the child’s unique capabilities, maturity and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Rogers v. Dorchester AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Holodook v. SpencerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Kelly v. Long Island Lighting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. De Witt Properties, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API