Legal Opinion

Atlanta Life Ins. Co. v. Bolden

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 14, 1940No. 8 Div. 39PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

Action of assumpsit by the beneficiary on a policy of life insurance against the insurer to recover the face amount of the policy with interest averred to be “due” thereon. The complaint follows, substantially, Form 12, prescribed by Section 9531 of the Code, and the demurrer thereto was overruled without error. American Nat. Ins. Co. v. Moss, 215 Ala. 542, 112 So. 110.

The defense asserted by the special pleas is that the insured forfeited the protection afforded by the policy by the failure to pay the premiums due after September 16, 1935, in consequence of which the policy…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Loveman, Joseph Loeb v. McQueenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  2. Union Naval Stores Co. v. PughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  3. American Nat. Ins. Co. v. MossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. H. H. Hitt Lumber Co. v. McCormackAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Fields v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mutual Sav. Life Ins. Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  2. Life & Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee v. LathamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  3. Mutual Sav. Life Ins. Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API