Legal Opinion

Dow Chemical Co. v. Warmack

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 12, 1983No. 83-215PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

In 1982 the appellees, husband and wife, agreed to lease fourteen-and-a-third acres of land to the appellant for the production of salt water (brine), from which bromine is to be extracted. When the Warmacks tendered a lease, Dow refused to accept it for the asserted reason that the Warmacks had only a non-participating interest in the minerals and therefore lacked the authority to execute a lease. In what is perhaps a test case the Warmacks brought this suit to compel Dow to accept the lease. The chancellor held that J. B. Warmack, under a printed form of Royalty…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McKinnon v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  2. Barret v. KuhnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Leonard v. Merchants & Farmers BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API